- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@oucs.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 09:16:04 +0000
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- CC: public-i18n-its@w3.org
I incline to the view that we should recommend using the simpler subset of XPath, but not mandate it; and leave it to XSLT-based implementations to trap the situation and if necessary fail if they detect patterns they cannot process. But also that we should stick to the subset of patterns in our test data and examples. Sebastian
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 09:18:12 UTC