- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:45:54 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2620 Summary: Necessity of dislocated scope / selectors *and* insitu scope / selectors Product: ITS Version: unspecified Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ITS tagset AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org ReportedBy: fsasaki@w3.org QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org Comment from Francois Richard, only entered into bugzilla by Felix: Currently, an ITS implementation has to decide whether it wants to use in situ or dislocated scope / selectors. Would it be possible to use only dislocated scope / selectors, and in situ only without selectors (but with a default scope for each data category)? That would make the conflict resolution between in situ and dislocated easier, and the overall design of ITS, without loosing expressive power of selectors (since every in situ selector can be expressed dislocated as well).
Received on Monday, 26 December 2005 08:45:59 UTC