- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 08:45:54 +0000
- To: public-i18n-its@w3.org
- Cc:
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=2620
Summary: Necessity of dislocated scope / selectors *and* insitu
scope / selectors
Product: ITS
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ITS tagset
AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
ReportedBy: fsasaki@w3.org
QAContact: public-i18n-its@w3.org
Comment from Francois Richard, only entered into bugzilla by Felix:
Currently, an ITS implementation has to decide whether it wants to use in situ
or dislocated scope / selectors. Would it be possible to use only dislocated
scope / selectors, and in situ only without selectors (but with a default scope
for each data category)? That would make the conflict resolution between in situ
and dislocated easier, and the overall design of ITS, without loosing expressive
power of selectors (since every in situ selector can be expressed dislocated as
well).
Received on Monday, 26 December 2005 08:45:59 UTC