Tuesday, 28 October 2014
- RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
Monday, 27 October 2014
Friday, 24 October 2014
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
Thursday, 23 October 2014
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- RE: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- Re: [xliff] ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
- ITS: Preserve space and Language Information
Monday, 20 October 2014
- [Minutes] ITS IG call 2014-10-20
- ACTION-54: Try to come up with example of xliff+its test format / output
- ACTION-53: Work on overlap example and to do conversion
- late start
- Provenance and Change Track Module
- RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- [Agenda] ITS IG Call 20 October (today), 15:00 UTC
Tuesday, 14 October 2014
Monday, 13 October 2014
Sunday, 12 October 2014
Saturday, 11 October 2014
Friday, 10 October 2014
- RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1
- Re: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1
- RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1
Thursday, 9 October 2014
- RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1
- RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- Re: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found
- Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- Re: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1
- Re: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- Re: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found
Wednesday, 8 October 2014
- RE: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found
- RE: ITS Mapping Update - some inconsistencies found
- RE: [xliff] ITS scope with sm/em
- ITS scope with sm/em
- RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1
- RE: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1
- Re: [xliff] possible issue with URN prefixes used to define acceptable namespaces in XLIFF 2.1