- From: Hariraam <hariraama@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:52:50 +0530
- To: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Cc: indic <public-i18n-indic@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFz0FBrRRZoEnq=-p07cJS2W9meMO+3b-MgV8r=_prtF8OUe3w@mail.gmail.com>
Sir, I understood and agree with your practical view:-- On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:44 PM, John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com> wrote: > ...., while your method might appear to work in some situations for the > particular case of the Devanagari ikar, other Indian writing systems > involve left ordering and split vowel signs that cannot be handled with > this kind of hack... It may not be viable for all the situations of Devanagari ikar. I thank you for giving a practical look on my suggestion. Being a world-leader in Font-makers, May I draw your kind attention on the point -- "if instead of using U+094E for left-side kana part of ikar, using a private glyph (not encoded) for it and using top-cap of ikar after the base consonants, can reduce some of the repeating events of re-ordering for Devangari Script ikar?" I think, this can be done only at OT font-designing level, without affecting the Indic Layout rules. I have more hope for the 'reph' problem, that can be solved only at OT font-designing level, without affecting the Indic Layout rules. So this issue perhaps does not relate to this group, I will submit the idea offline (by private Email). Regards. हरिराम प्रगत भारत <http://hariraama.blogspot.com>
Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 11:23:18 UTC