- From: John Hudson <tiro@tiro.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 22:57:13 -0700
- To: Asmus Freytag <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>
- CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>, public-i18n-core@w3.org, indic <public-i18n-indic@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org
Asmus wrote: > if Iyou had to determine why letterspacing as e m p h a s i s was ever > invented, then the absence of italic in Fraktur definitely seem to have > been a motivation... Yes, I understand this to be fairly well established by type historians. After italics developed their articulatory rôle in 'antiqua' typography, fraktur typographers sought a means to express the same kind of articulations in fraktur text; since they lacked secondary styles, they settled on letterspacing. There's a nice typographical pun in one of Søren Kierkegaard's books, in which he describes a state of existential anxiety as a feeling of being l e t t e r s p a c e d, which captures the feeling of fragmentation of the self. Of course, the early Danish editions of Kierkegaard were set in fraktur type, so the metaphor worked visually because letterspacing was the method used for emphasis. In a later edition, set in antiqua type, the typography was changed so emphasis was indicated with italics; bizarrely, the editors took it upon themselves to change Kierkegaard's text to liken existential anxiety to being italicised. > PS: on hyphenation the Unicode forum (http://unicode.org/forum) just > recently gave an exception to the dictum "Arabic is never hyphenated" > (turns out to be false on the script level, but true on the language > level. Uighur, written in Arabic script, can apparently be hyphenated). Yes. In Uighur words can be broken at linebreaks with a baseline hyphen*, but the preceding letter and the first letter on the next line are shaped as if they were still connected. Tricky stuff. * The Uighur hyphen mark seems to be a recent phenomenon, probably no earlier than the 1990s; prior to this, words were broken without a mark: No particular symbol is used to indicate end-of-line divisions in the kona yeziq. Where applicable, the last letter before a division appears in its initial or medial form, and the first letter after a division appears in its medial or final form. In other words, they appear as though they were still connected, despite being on two different lines. [Hahn, Reinhard F. _Spoken Uyghur._ 1991] Since not all Uighur letters have a left-side connection, one can see how the hyphen sign would be a useful adjunct to the linebreak system, since it avoids possible ambiguity about whether one is looking at a broken word or two separate words. JH
Received on Saturday, 16 April 2011 06:01:30 UTC