- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:54:30 -0700
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- CC: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, 'WWW International' <www-international@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, indic <public-i18n-indic@w3.org>, CJK discussion <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org
On 04/14/2011 11:26 AM, John Cowan wrote: > Leif Halvard Silli scripsit: > >> I considered stating that she could investigate those scripts. But >> anyway, let us look at Limbu examples, since that is aparently what you >> have done: >> http://omniglot.com/writing/limbu.htm >> http://www.xenotypetech.com/samplepdfs/LB_Sample.html >> >> How do you come to that conclusion? Are you looking at the word spaces? >> Are the spaces result of adaptation to the "computer age"? Anyway, >> please note that "_and_ have discrete, unconnected (in print) units >> within words" is part of the discrete definition. > > Very well: see p. 18 of http://www.evertype.com/standards/iso10646/pdf/n2339-limbu.pdf. > This was printed by offset. The main point that distinguishes 'discrete' from 'connected' is that letter-spacing is allowed to be used for justification. Cases to look at include - lines that have no word separators, and thus can't be justified that way - mixtures with scripts such as CJK, where letter-spacing is sometimes applied equally to discrete scripts during justification Similarly 'clustered' vs 'discrete' can be distinguished by what happens when you mix the two scripts. Leif says I should just list all the scripts in Unicode and categorize them. Great idea in theory. But in practice, I do not know enough about their typesetting behavior to make a correct categorization and do not have access to enough printed materials in all the scripts in Unicode to make an educated guess. ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 15 April 2011 08:58:37 UTC