- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:29:53 -0000
- To: "'Martin Duerst'" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, "'GEO'" <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Hi Martin, > From: Martin Duerst [mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp] > Sent: 03 February 2006 03:16 > It's more than 1MB with all the images. This is not helped by the use of .png graphics, which strangely turn out much larger than corresponding .gifs would be. I'm thinking of maybe changing to gifs. > > Of course, a much better solution would be to use SVG for the > slides, that would reduce the bandwidth dramatically and have > other nice side-effects (e.g. accesssibility). True, but then you wouldn't be able to correctly see half the examples because of the limitations of svg players (eg. arabic text doesn't join). Plus, until we have some better converters or editors, it would make slide development or modification so time consuming that it would seriously affect maintainability. In addition, many people won't have and won't be allowed to have SVG plug-ins in their browsers. Believe me, I'd be much happier if we could use SVG, and I've tried it in the past. Wrt accessibility, I've taken great pains to build in accessibility constructs and ensure that, for example, someone who can't see the graphics can get as much information as possible (and usually all the information you could expect) from the notes. Cheers, RI
Received on Friday, 3 February 2006 09:29:56 UTC