- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:03:33 +0900
- To: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>, GEO <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Richard, Congratulations! -- Felix On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 02:29:19 +0900, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org> wrote: > > Now that August is over, I have compiled the results of our feedback > surveys. See > > http://www.w3.org/International/geo/feedback/0508.html > > We had 68 respondents, which (especially given that we are introducing > the survey forms gradually over the month) is, I think, terrific. > > Most of our respondents appear to be 'developers'. Nearly all those who > said they were content authors or designers also saw themselves as > developers. > > I played around for some time to find a good way of summarising > information on a document by document and respondent type basis, but in > the end I gave up: it would be too much work to do it in detail, and I > think you can get a very good idea of who the responses are coming from, > and what each respondent type thinks, by just looking at the raw data > (treat it like a scatter diagram). > > I suppose, however, that we will want to address this again at some > point in order to see information across multiple months. Any > statistical geniuses who want to offer help, please step up... > > Note that there is also additional information available, such as user > agent type and user agent language, that I have not recorded here. > > Note also that I excluded one feedback form from the result. This > response gave a score of 1, and declared the user to be of every type. > The score was not consistent with other views on the same documents, and > this just looks bogus to me. > > > RI > > > ============ > Richard Ishida > W3C > > contact info: > http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ > > W3C Internationalization: > http://www.w3.org/International/ > > Publication blog: > http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ > >
Received on Friday, 2 September 2005 11:03:42 UTC