- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 04:50:41 +0200
- To: "Felix Sasaki" <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Cc: "Richard Ishida" <ishida@w3.org>, GEO <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
On Monday, July 4, 2005, 4:26:13 AM, Felix wrote: FS> Hi Richard, FS> Just a minor point about the FAQ: FS> "A character entity. This is a very different animal. All should be FS> predefined in the markup language definition." FS> Could be changed to FS> "A character entity. This is a very different animal. All should be FS> predefined in the markup language definition as XML DTD entity FS> declarations" FS> I'm not happy with that wording, Nor I. How about: "A character entity. This is a very different animal. All should be defined in document instance (internal DTD subset). Relying on the markup language definition (external DTD subset) is fragile, as fetching it is optional.." FS> but I would like to express that FS> character entities rely on the XML DTD mechanism for general entities, FS> which is e.g. not available in RELAX NG. The DTD mechanism is unaffected by the use of RelaxNG or W3C XML Schema validation. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Monday, 4 July 2005 02:50:53 UTC