- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 02:52:55 +0200
- To: Andrew Cunningham <andrewc@vicnet.net.au>
- Cc: Deborah Cawkwell <deborah.cawkwell@bbc.co.uk>, public-i18n-geo@w3.org
On Thursday, April 14, 2005, 1:52:05 AM, Andrew wrote: AC> Deborah Cawkwell wrote: >> 'Generic font family' is the correct term according to the current CSS (2) spec. AC> There are certain assumptions made wrt to "Generic font family". AC> One is that users actually do change the preferences/options in their AC> web browsers to select preferred fonts. Mozilla/firefox allows you to AC> specify diferent fonts for different generic styles. Yes, its assumed that some browsers alow this to be configured. That other browsers do not allow it to be easily/at all configured does not invalidate the concept. AC> IE only allows you to specify a proportional font and a monospaced font, AC> so no idea how a user can control what font is selected when a generic AC> font family is specified. AC> It also assumes that the languages in use a supported by common fonts on AC> the OS. Yes and no. Its hard from a simple setting to set different preferences for different languages (it is possible in a user stylesheet, although by language not by script). Also, recall that the generic font families are not the end of the chain - just the end of expressed preferences. A browser can, and should, attempt to display a character that is not displayable using a specified or generic font by using any other font it knows about. AC> For those languages that are only supported by a small number of AC> specific fonts (and are unsopported by common fonts supporting that AC> script), then there is little value in specifying a generic font family. Well, if its the users preferred language then they would presumably set one of those fonts as their default. AC> Just my 2 cents worth. >> "Generic font families are a fallback mechanism, a means of >> preserving some of the style sheet author's intent in the worst case >> when none of the specified fonts can be selected. For optimum >> typographic control, particular named fonts should be used in style >> sheets. [...]" >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2/fonts.html#generic-font-families >> >> There are 5: serif, sans-serif, cursive, fantasy, monospace. >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/ >> >> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain >> personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically >> stated. >> If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. >> Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in >> reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the >> BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. >> Further communication will signify your consent to this. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2005 00:52:57 UTC