- From: Russ Rolfe <rrolfe@windows.microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 08:25:30 -0800
- To: "Jungshik Shin" <jshin@i18nl10n.com>, <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Jungshik, If it does work on Win9x/ME, then call that a bonus, because it was not a supported feature. Regards, Russ (rrolfe) One of the World-Ready Guides (wrg) Are you World-Ready? http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev -----Original Message----- From: public-i18n-geo-request@w3.org [mailto:public-i18n-geo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jungshik Shin Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 9:07 PM To: public-i18n-geo@w3.org Subject: Re: Non-Latin Font name behavior in IE Hi, > Windows 2000 and later processes the Asian (non-Latin) native font > names the same way as the Latin font name. It is just a function of > the OS and not a function of IE. Of course this means that it does not > work on Win9x. Did you actually test that on Win 9x/ME? I also thought it wouldn't work on Win 9x/ME, but it might just work because some 'W' APIs on Win 9x/ME are 'natively' supported (although font-enum APIs are not likely to be among those). See <http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=231426> for a mozilla bug on the issue. BTW, it'd better to say 'non-ASCII' (instead of non-Latin) because the only ASCII part is common in all Windows code pages. Anyway, it's not a good idea to list only native font names in CSS because some OS'/browsers cannot recognize native font names. They always have to be followed by the corresponding ASCII-only names. Jungshik
Received on Friday, 19 March 2004 11:25:55 UTC