Re: New version of language tutorial

ok, I guess I misunderstood what "this" referenced.

As Emily Litella says: "never mind"

;-)

tex


"Addison Phillips [wM]" wrote:
> 
> I thought what I was favoring was the same thing you are favoring ;-).

> >
> > > > Note that this topic is VERY controversial (in certain
> > > > circles). es-americas was rejected by the RFC3066 language
> > > > tag reviewer. I read this as taking a position on that
> > > > argument (one that I favor, but one that someone could object too).
> >
> > Guess who! ;-) Why do you favor it?
> > It seems very reasonable to me, if you have defined words that
> > are acceptable
> > in the Americas and not perhaps in Europe, to have a label to
> > distinguish it
> > from other versions (such as an es-mx if it exists) and not have
> > it confused
> > with an es, for which it may not be appropriate.
> >
> > From a w3c perspective, it would be nice for a user to specify to
> > their UA that
> > they would like to accept language such as es-americas, without
> > having to list
> > every latin american country and give it greater priority than
> > es, or es-es,
> > etc.
> >
> > Perhaps we should ask on the ig list, if there are latin-american
> > users that
> > have an opinion.
> >
> > (Just to collect data, not to argue the point.)

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898  mailto:Tex at XenCraft.com
Xen Master         XenCraft           http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------

Received on Friday, 12 March 2004 00:39:51 UTC