- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 11:16:39 -0000
- To: <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] Sent: 06 November 2003 10:37 To: 'Chris Lilley' Cc: Richard Ishida Subject: RE: New FAQ: Setting encoding in web authoring applications Thanks Chris, I'll change "The presence of the BOM can create problems in older browsers" to "The presence of the BOM for UTF-8 encoded pages can create problems in older browsers" > An entry for XML Spy would be good, as would some entries for SVG creation tools. If you can provide some info for us, I'll add it. Cheers, RI PS: Can I copy this to the GEO group? ============ Richard Ishida W3C contact info: http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://www.w3.org/International/geo/ W3C Internationalization FAQs http://www.w3.org/International/questions.html RSS feed: http://www.w3.org/International/questions.rss > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] > Sent: 06 November 2003 10:15 > To: Richard Ishida > Subject: Re: New FAQ: Setting encoding in web authoring applications > > > On Thursday, November 6, 2003, 10:34:42 AM, Richard wrote: > > > > RI> The latest FAQ addressed by the GEO task force is: > > RI> How do I set character encoding in my web authoring > applications? > > RI> Find our answer at: > RI> > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-setting-encoding- in-app RI> lica RI> tions.html >From that document > Some applications automatically insert BOM markup, while others do > not. The presence of the BOM can create problems in older browsers. Someone reading that might think 'so, remove it to avoid problems in older browsers'. Not good if the document is UTF-16. An entry for XML Spy would be good, as would some entries for SVG creation tools. -- Chris mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 6 November 2003 06:17:09 UTC