- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 14:24:56 -0000
- To: <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
FYI. A summary of the mtg of the WAI task force for Techniques & Checklists. I have also updated the link pointing to WAI requirements for techniques & checklists at http://www.w3.org/International/geo/#work RI -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm Sent: 17 January 2003 03:14 To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: 16 Jan 2003 - WCAG WG Teleconference Minutes Available at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/2003/01/16-minutes.html Short summary: - we discussed and resolved issues with 2.1 . - we discussed the techniques requirements. we have a couple resolutions of changes to make. decided to make changes, let it sit for a week, ask for issues at next week's call and if no show stoppers publish to TR next Friday - discussed dates for F2F at CSUN. wendy sent options to the list for voting. - discussed conformance logos and gregg's proposal re: conformance to 1.0 and 2.0. gregg and jason took action items to propose text for inclusion in conformance section. Summary of action Items and resolutions - resolution: checkpoint text (2.1): Ensure that all of the functionality is operable, at a minimum, through the keyboard or other character input device. word success criterion accordingly (will say basically the same thing but in success criterion language) - resolution: ensure that our use of the word content is consistent with other guidelines. - action editors: take use of word content to xtech (for glossary discussion) - resolution: delete level 2 criterion. - resolution: make addition to benefits ala wendy's proposal (ala interpretation of comments from aaron and WWAAC folks) - resolution (reqs for techs): replace "human testable" with "reliably human testable" - resolution (reqs for techs): replace "untestable" with "not reliably testable" - resolution (reqs for techs): replace "human evaluators" with "knowledgeable human evaluators" - resolution (reqs for techs): incorporate these resolutions, publish back to list, check in with folks at next thursday's meeting, if ok, then move forward. - action wendy: send set of proposals (for csun f2f dates) to the list for different votes and ask people to vote. - action gregg: draft resolution (related to proposal about conforming to 1.0 vs 2.0) so that can be reflected in the conformance section of the guidelines (ways of reporting and use of logo). deadline: 3 weeks from now - action jason: draft something after gregg finishes submits his proposal (about making conformance claims). Please send corrections and omissions. Best, --wendy -- wendy a chisholm world wide web consortium web accessibility initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI/ /--
Received on Monday, 20 January 2003 09:27:39 UTC