RE: Overlay illustration

As for coming up with a glossary, I have one here at Microsoft that we could maybe use as basic start.  Then add and delete what we need to.

Just an idea.

Regards, Russ

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 9:54 AM
To: 'Tex Texin'
Cc: 'GEO'
Subject: RE: Overlay illustration



Good idea.


============
Richard Ishida
W3C

tel: +44 1753 480 292
http://www.w3.org/International/ http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tex Texin [mailto:tex@i18nguy.com]
> Sent: 15 January 2003 17:52
> To: ishida@w3.org
> Cc: 'Tex Texin'; 'GEO'
> Subject: Re: Overlay illustration
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Richard Ishida wrote:
>  
> > > Should we have a glossary section within the document or perhaps
> > > another doc as glossary that we link to?
> > 
> > Let's hold fire on this for now, since the W3C are talking about
> > possibly having a centralised glossary.  I would say 
> another doc, in
> > any case, if only to reduce maintenance.
> 
> 
> how about we begin a list somewhere of terms that should be
> in a glossary to meet our needs? then we don't need to go 
> back and cull the list. We don't have to attempt definitions now.
> 
> tex
> 
> 
> --
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Tex Texin   cell: +1 781 789 1898   mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
> Xen Master                          http://www.i18nGuy.com
>                          
> XenCraft		            http://www.XenCraft.com
> Making e-Business Work Around the World
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 13:29:07 UTC