- From: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 10:51:19 -0500
- To: ishida@w3.org, GEO <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
looks very good. Consider making the year 2003.
Should we have a glossary section within the document or perhaps another
doc as glossary that we link to?
Should we standardize/standardise spellings?
On META statements, I think references should be to "META CONTENT-TYPE"
statements not "META" statements.
Saying "META" should be early as possible is meaningless... It's the
charset that needs to be early.
Or perhaps they should be called "CONTENT-TYPE" statements or
"CONTENT-TYPE" META statements?
tex
Richard Ishida wrote:
>
> Chaps,
>
> I have knocked up a very quick illustration (attached) to help me
> discuss the idea of overlays during today's meeting. Please try to have
> access to this during the meeting.
>
> RI
>
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> W3C
>
> tel: +44 1753 480 292
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: page-header-overlay.html
> page-header-overlay.html Type: Hypertext Markup Language (text/html)
> Encoding: quoted-printable
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com
XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2003 10:52:20 UTC