- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 09:17:26 -0000
- To: <public-i18n-geo@w3.org>
Tex Texin a écrit : > and decided we need an author for a faq on when it is appropriate, or > not, to use language negotiation. I'll take that. Accomplices welcome. -- François > > ======================== > Some time was spent today discussing when this type of negotiation > should be used, and when alternatives should be considered. I was > actioned with posing the question to the group, to collect information > and to solicit whether someone might be interested in authoring a FAQ > or article on when to use this technique. > > We thought Yves, John or François might have a special interest in > this subject and so I cc'd them individually. > > For example, there were suggestions that this approach only made sense > where every page had an exact counterpart in another language or > region. Many sites have different pages or file organization based on > differences in content. > > It might be the case that Language negotiation only makes sense for > the entry page and after that page is read and a language either > defaulted or selected by the user, the rest of the content would be > linked directly, without relying on language negotiation. > > Some thought organization by language directory (e.g. > yadda/en/pages.html) might be more practical than by filename (e.g. > yadda/pages.en.html) > > There were questions about server load and scalability. > > There was also a discussion of roles and authorization, as content > developers may not have access to some server commands, and we > considered there is guidance needed for content developers and > separate guidance needed for administrators. > > So, we would like to ask if there is someone in the to-list who would > like to author or contribute to a faq on the subject of when to use > language negotiation and when not to, or defining situations where are > alternatives prefered. > > Any takers? > > > > >
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2003 04:17:36 UTC