- From: Andrew Cunningham <andrewc@mail.vicnet.net.au>
- Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 16:53:29 +1100
- To: ishida@w3.org
- Cc: public-i18n-geo@w3.org
Hi Richard, Richard Ishida wrote: > >1] Does it still make sense to have a separate FTF at Microsoft, given the Tech Plenary in Boston in March? > > My first reaction is that it wouldn't make much sense to have two FTF's close together. But on second thoughts it might provide a timeframe for us to work towards if we had clearly identified milestones or tasks for each FTF. But its academic to me in a sense, since I could only attend either in a virtual sense, by teleconference or videoconferencing. >2] Who would like to hold a meeting during the Tech Plenary? > >3] Who would like to hold a meeting at the IUC in Prague? > >4] If we do hold a meeting at Microsoft before the Tech Plenary, is the timing right, or should we move it into February. > > Really depends on whether we can get through enough material to make the Microsoft FTF worthwhile. I suspect that a FTF at Microsoft and Boston may be too close to get any real benefit from the second FTF, unless we're quite focused. Depends onhow much we can work through between the two FtF's within the context of our other commitments. Andrew Andrew Cunningham Multilingual Technical Officer Online Porjects Team, Vicnet State Library of Victoria Australia andrewc@vicnet.net.au
Received on Monday, 16 December 2002 00:53:27 UTC