- From: Daniel Yacob <yacob@geez.org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 22:17:00 -0400
- To: public-i18n-ethiopic@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CACvO6KCDM_wZLStdsgHhDY_YxQd-Eq1=kySGz=7_d682dkovng@mail.gmail.com>
Greetings All, Firstly, I hope everyone is safe and well during this challenging time and will pull through it intact and with a renewed appreciation of the gift that is life. An update is long overdue here, and I've nearly sent one a dozen times over, my apologies for not succeeding. In the previous update I reported that a survey was to be translated and then circulated for expert input. What we learned from two translators that we worked with was that the text was too difficult to translate clearly, and wouldn't make sense if translated. Any translation would still be confusing to the reader. Instead of surveying to answer a shopping list of questions, they suggested another approach that would lead to a result that would be more easily understood and would garner better feedback. The recommendation was to write a style guide and then have experts react to it and make suggestions and corrections. The view was that it is better to state rules, rather than ask what rules should be, as was the approach in the survey form. To this end a style guide was initiated that covered the same topics as the survey. By "style guide" I refer to a writer's style guide such as the MLA, APA, or Chicago Manual of Style to name a few. However, with the reduced scope that the style guide would only cover formatting and layout topics that software would be expected to automate. The style guide would *not* cover how to write good prose and give guidance on grammar. The survey effort then took the direction of producing a basic style guide to bring to the Ethiopian Writers Association to present to their members for feedback. The development of the style guide is ongoing and can be reviewed here: https://w3c.github.io/elreq/style-guide/ It is largely modeled after the Chicago Manual of Style, simply for its good inventory of formatting topics. The recommendations in the draft style guide offer what would be a likely candidate for a best practice from amongst known variations in practices. Sometimes a section simply presents a "best guess" when there is no clear basis to recommend one approach over another. It is expected that expert stakeholders would correct any guess that is in error. I'll end here. Again my apologies for the long break in communications. -Daniel
Received on Thursday, 2 April 2020 02:17:25 UTC