Re: agenda+ Unicode escape sequences in rdf-turtle

• From: Addison Phillips <addisoni18n@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 16:44:15 -0700
• To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
• Message-ID: <8e842dde-655c-4180-b426-63937729065c@gmail.com>

On 4/8/2026 1:31 AM, Fuqiao Xue wrote:
> https://github.com/w3c/rdf-turtle/issues/130
>
> Unlike JavaScript, RDF is used as a data format. Introducing a new 
> escape sequence might be harder. Should we allow them to proceed?
>
>
A key consideration here is whether "new" (1.2) documents should be or 
are likely to be processed by existing processors. A new syntax will 
break these (or fail to be processed correctly). This is a similar 
consideration to that in the discussion of the u/U escapes in the other 
thread.

Addison

-- 
Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2026 23:44:21 UTC