agenda+ Gap could be misunderstood as a literal typographic gap

• From: Fuqiao Xue <xfq@w3.org>
• Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 08:29:31 +0800
• To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
• Message-Id: <531F30AC-1A8F-4D8C-9281-117C71A5A878@w3.org>

We got an issue saying that 'gap' in our Layout Gap Analysis documents may cause ambiguity because the it could be misunderstood as a literal typographic gap:

  https://github.com/w3c/clreq/issues/694

I think that there is no need to modify the document name because of this, but if we want to do something, we can consider making the definition of 'Gap Analysis' clearer in the document. Any comments?

~xfq

Received on Thursday, 14 August 2025 00:29:46 UTC