Re: I18N needs more review time [I18N-ACTION-576]

Dear Addison,

Thank you for letting us know. We did not quite get to the stage we hoped
for back in November, and have a face to face meeting in January (12 and
13) to review an updated ED so I don't think that this will cause us any
particular problems.

I should let you know that we hope to have a "last call" style WD as soon
as possible after that meeting, probably after a further round of edits;
if we can incorporate your comments then that would be very helpful.

Kind regards (for TTWG!),


On 22/12/2016, 18:29, "Phillips, Addison" <> wrote:

>Dear TT WG,
>I'm writing on behalf of the Internationalization (I18N) Working Group to
>let you know that we will need more time to review the TTML2
>specification. We hope to have comments to you by mid-January. Please let
>us know if this constitutes a hardship for you or if there are specific
>dates we should try to anticipate with our comments.
>Regards (for I18N),
>Addison Phillips
>Principal SDE, I18N Architect (Amazon)
>Chair (W3C I18N WG)
>Internationalization is not a feature.
>It is an architecture.

Received on Friday, 23 December 2016 14:41:15 UTC