- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:11:22 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15489 Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(duerst@it.aoyama. | |ac.jp) | --- Comment #38 from Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> --- (In reply to Anne from comment #34) > So I think the best solution here is simply change the definition of what > constitutes a "valid e-mail address". > > This is a little bit backwards incompatible, but given that servers will > already have to validate what ends up being submitted I don't think it will > actually be a problem, especially since EAI is a strict superset. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3 extends atext so before @ we > should be okay. > > After @ we have 'label *( "." label )' today which I think together with the > @ we could replace with At-domain as updated by > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3 of course. > > Martin, Kent, what do you think about that? Are you asking about whether I prefer extending the definition of "valid e-mail address", or distinguishing ASCII-only and EAI email addresses? I think either could work. This should be decided with input from browser makers and server operators. If you are asking about something else, please make that a bit clearer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:11:25 UTC