- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 09:11:22 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15489
Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(duerst@it.aoyama. |
|ac.jp) |
--- Comment #38 from Martin Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> ---
(In reply to Anne from comment #34)
> So I think the best solution here is simply change the definition of what
> constitutes a "valid e-mail address".
>
> This is a little bit backwards incompatible, but given that servers will
> already have to validate what ends up being submitted I don't think it will
> actually be a problem, especially since EAI is a strict superset.
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3 extends atext so before @ we
> should be okay.
>
> After @ we have 'label *( "." label )' today which I think together with the
> @ we could replace with At-domain as updated by
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6531#section-3.3 of course.
>
> Martin, Kent, what do you think about that?
Are you asking about whether I prefer extending the definition of "valid e-mail
address", or distinguishing ASCII-only and EAI email addresses? I think either
could work. This should be decided with input from browser makers and server
operators.
If you are asking about something else, please make that a bit clearer.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 30 March 2016 09:11:25 UTC