- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:12:15 +0000
- To: victoria@markpoles.org.uk, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
hello Victoria, On 09/02/2015 15:21, richard@w3.org wrote: > http://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-escapes.en.php > > > Name: Victoria Clare ... > I was hoping for guidance on how best to encode the em dash and en dash characters. > > Writing style guides are firm that, for example, written fiction in standard English should use these for a certain kind of pause. The characters are widely used in novels, historical writing etc. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash http://www.dashhyphen.com/using-the-dash/ > > But I don't have those characters on my English language keyboard, and most of the wysiwyg interfaces I use don't support them. So writers end up manually searching and replacing these characters through HTML when they are writing online. This may help: http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/type-em-en-dashes-word-processor/ > To my mind &mdash; is clearly superior to &#x2014; because I can at least immediately see what it's supposed to be in my document. Although best of all would be to somehow get the little annoyances added to a standard English language character set, and ideally, to my keyboard! I tend to agree that — is easier to spot, type and remember than —. We sounded a word of caution in the article above for the case where the content was to be used directly in XML – since XML doesn't by default recognise the entities. Personally, these days, I mostly tend to use and such when I need an escaped form. However, because it's easy on a Mac, I always type my en and em dashes as characters. hope that helps, ri
Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 18:12:42 UTC