- From: John C Klensin <john+w3c@jck.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 13:55:27 -0400
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
(sorry - wrong address on earlier version)
Opinion...
--On Monday, July 07, 2014 18:20 +0100 Richard Ishida
<ishida@w3.org> wrote:
> Also, it occurred to me while reading that we really want
> people to review the editor's draft rather than the working
> draft.
We should at least be _very_ clear about which one we want them
to review. I think that is a "yes".
This has two implications:
>
> 1. we should add a highly visible piece of text to the start
> of the WD saying 'look over here ->'
Yes.
> 2. perhaps we should have dated versions of the editor's draft
> (?)
Desirable in any event, critical if it is going to change at
intervals shorter than many months (which I think it
will/should).
> What do you think?
see above.
john
Received on Monday, 7 July 2014 17:58:06 UTC