[Bug 22718] I18N-ISSUE-123: explicit use of U+202C to close runs of phrasing content


Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> ---
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:


Status: Rejected
Change Description: none
Rationale: The requirements described in this paragraph are authoring
requirements, not UA requirements. Authors who use bidirectional-algorithm
formatting characters manually must conform to those requirements but we can't
have authors process end tags in any specific manner — that would be UA

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Friday, 14 March 2014 10:27:57 UTC