[Bug 16190] Polyglot Markup: Clarify that xml:lang is optional


--- Comment #4 from Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com> ---
This ended abruptly and without conclusive proposed text. The same seems true
for bug 16166, in which much relevant discussion took place. Am I to take it
that Leif's final thoughts in comment 3 contain the resolution, that xml:lang
should be optional? 

I tend toward keeping the text as it is, that polyglot markup uses both
xml:lang and @lang. If you have come to consensus otherwise, however, I am
willing to incorporate that.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 20:38:25 UTC