- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:38:15 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16190 --- Comment #4 from Eliot Graff <eliotgra@microsoft.com> --- This ended abruptly and without conclusive proposed text. The same seems true for bug 16166, in which much relevant discussion took place. Am I to take it that Leif's final thoughts in comment 3 contain the resolution, that xml:lang should be optional? I tend toward keeping the text as it is, that polyglot markup uses both xml:lang and @lang. If you have come to consensus otherwise, however, I am willing to incorporate that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 April 2013 20:38:25 UTC