- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 15:56:07 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17859 --- Comment #9 from Addison Phillips <addison@lab126.com> --- (In reply to comment #7) > Mark Davis > created a very nice example of this. I guess that was at an Unicode > Conference a few years ago. I'm not sure it's online, but I'm sure he can > make it available. It's in UTS#35 (it's the second link I put into comment #5): http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr35/#Language_and_Locale_IDs But I'll quote it here: -- Criteria for what makes a written language should be purely pragmatic; what would copy-editors say? If one gave them text like the following, they would respond that is far from acceptable English for publication, and ask for it to be redone: "Theatre Center News: The date of the last version of this document was 2003年3月20日. A copy can be obtained for $50,0 or 1.234,57 грн. We would like to acknowledge contributions by the following authors (in alphabetical order): Alaa Ghoneim, Behdad Esfahbod, Ahmed Talaat, Eric Mader, Asmus Freytag, Avery Bishop, and Doug Felt." So one would change it to either B or C below, depending on which orthographic variant of English was the target for the publication: "Theater Center News: The date of the last version of this document was 3/20/2003. A copy can be obtained for $50.00 or 1,234.57 Ukrainian Hryvni. We would like to acknowledge contributions by the following authors (in alphabetical order): Alaa Ghoneim, Ahmed Talaat, Asmus Freytag, Avery Bishop, Behdad Esfahbod, Doug Felt, Eric Mader." "Theatre Centre News: The date of the last version of this document was 20/3/2003. A copy can be obtained for $50.00 or 1,234.57 Ukrainian Hryvni. We would like to acknowledge contributions by the following authors (in alphabetical order): Alaa Ghoneim, Ahmed Talaat, Asmus Freytag, Avery Bishop, Behdad Esfahbod, Doug Felt, Eric Mader." Clearly there are many acceptable variations on this text. For example, copy editors might still quibble with the use of first versus last name sorting in the list, but clearly the first list was not acceptable English alphabetical order. And in quoting a name, like "Theatre Centre News", one may leave it in the source orthography even if it differs from the publication target orthography. And so on. However, just as clearly, there limits on what is acceptable English, and "2003年3月20日", for example, is not. --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 15:56:12 UTC