- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 08:48:48 -0700
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
FYI... > -----Original Message----- > From: Ivan Herman [mailto:ivan@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 8:49 AM > To: chairs@w3.org > Cc: Ashok Malhotra; Eric Prud'hommeaux; Michael Hausenblas > Subject: TransAnn: 2nd Last Call Working Draft transition announcement for > RDB2RDF, deadline June 19 > > Chairs, All, > > This is the 2nd Last Call Working Draft transition announcement for the > following Recommendation Track specifications: > > Document Title: 'A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF' > URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-rdb-direct-mapping-20120529/ > > Document Title: 'R2RML: RDB to RDF Mapping Language' > URI: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-r2rml-20120529/ > > The 2nd Last Call has been made necessary by some minor issues that have > arisen during the (otherwise successful) Candidate Recommendation phase. > The main changes on the documents are: > > - binary SQL values are now mapped to xsd:hexBinary instead of > xsd:base64Binary > - the prohibition of unnamed columns in rr:sqlQuery has been relaxed > - the notion of an R2RML default mapping generator was added in order to > better describe R2RML's relationship to the Direct Mapping specification > - the Direct Mapping %-escaping rules are now compatible with R2RML, and > the delimiter characters have been changed to one that are safe under these > rules ('.' is changed for ';' and '-' is changed for '=') > > 1. Instructions for providing feedback > > If you wish to make comments regarding this specification please send them to > <public-rdb2rdf-comments@w3.org> which is an email list publicly archived > athttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-comments/ > > 2. Review end date > > This Last Call period ends on 19 June 2012. > > The RDB2RDF Working Group made the decision [1] for the LC transition at its > teleconference on 22 May 2012. > > It is the intention of the group to move to Proposed Recommendation with > these documents after the 2nd LC period ends, unless some new issues come up > (and the implentations catch up with these changes in that time period). > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/05/22-RDB2RDF-minutes.html > > 3. Evidence that the document satisfies group's requirements > > The RDB2RDF Working Group believes that these specifications satisfy the > requirements of the charter [2] as well as the 'Use Cases and Requirements for > Mapping Relational Databases to RDF' [3]. > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2009/08/rdb2rdf-charter > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/rdb2rdf-ucr/ > > 4. The names of groups with dependencies > > The following groups are suspected to have an interest in reviewing the > specifications: > > * SPARQL Working Group > * RDF Working Group > * Provenance Working Group > > 5. Report of any Formal Objections > > The Working Group received no Formal Objection during the preparation of > this specification. > > 6. Patent Disclosure Page > > A link can be found at http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/43889/status > > Cheers, > Michael and Ashok, RDB2RDF co-chairs, Ivan and Eric, staff contacts of > the WG, on behalf of the RDB2RDF WG > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2012 15:49:15 UTC