- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:57:00 +0900
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
On 2011/11/30 6:10, Phillips, Addison wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian@hixie.ch] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:44 AM >> To: Paul Cotton >> Cc: public-html@w3.org; MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given)<eb2m- >> mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> (eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp); Phillips, Addison >> Subject: Re: ISSUE-172: restore-rb- Chairs Solicit Proposals >> >> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Paul Cotton wrote: >>> >>> 'restore<rb> as an optional element' >>> >>> Per the decision policy, at this time the chairs would like to solicit >> volunteers to write Change Proposals for ISSUE-172: >>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/172 >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalatio >>> n >>> >>> If no Change Proposals are written by January 7th, 2012 this issue will be >> closed without prejudice. >>> >>> Issue status link: >>> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-172 >> >> This is still premature. I'm currently waiting for information from Richard >> Ishida and the i18n group regarding the discussion we had at TPAC. >> >> If every time I wait for feedback this bug is going to be escalated, this is going >> to make working with other groups an incredibly frustrating experience. And if every time people give detailed feedback, he rejects it and says "feedback needed" (or some such), this makes working with THE EDITOR an incredibly frustrating experience. Regards, Martin. P.S.: Of course I'm interested to hear what went on at TPAC re. Ruby and <rb>.
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2011 08:57:38 UTC