RE: I18n and Linked Data - an important (but fixable) omission?

> > Maybe it could be called "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)",
> define
> > URIs, and refer also to IRIs.
> It's unfortunately somewhat hidden, so you may not be aware of, but in
> terms of technology, in particular RDF, what it calls "URIs" are
> actually IRIs. Please have a look at

I think there is a problem with this interpretation. This document uses the term "RDF URI" as an umbrella for URI [with reference to obsolete RFC 2396] along with an anticipated IRI specification. The current RFCs [RFC 3986 and RFC 3987] don't seem to oblige this umbrella use of "URI" outside an RDF context.


Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 20:36:56 UTC