- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:17:01 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10830 --- Comment #35 from Murata <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp> 2011-08-22 12:17:00 UTC --- Again, I think that error recovery for broken <ruby><rb>annotation<rt>base<rb>annotation<rt>base</ruby> does not prove information useful for this discussion. In the case of dl, there can be several (dt, dd) pairs. In the case of ruby, only one pair is allowed. Thus, error recovery is different. That's all. I wrote: "All arguments against rt apply to dt.". I have seen two arguments. The argument that rb is not widely used is very incorrect. The argument that span is always available certainly applies to dt. I would like to ask this issue be discussed by the WG, which certainly has developers of existing browsers. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 22 August 2011 12:17:02 UTC