- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:57:57 +0000
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12417
Yves <ysavourel@enlaso.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ysavourel@enlaso.com
--- Comment #9 from Yves <ysavourel@enlaso.com> 2011-07-26 15:57:55 UTC ---
Hi,
I support Jirka and Richard on this.
> Using class="notranslate" isn't an abuse as far as I can tell.
The class attribute is used for other things. Overloading it with "notranslate"
is not a viable solution.
> This seems like a feature that would get only narrow use.
> Is it really worth adding to the language?
I disagree. Several content providers are using workaround because a standard
solution does not exist.
> It seems like the ideal solution would be a new
> language subtag, frankly.
Using a subtag is not the solution either. It overloads the value with
information that has nothing to do with the language.
-Yves Savourel
ENLASO Corporation
www.translate.com
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2011 15:57:58 UTC