- From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:14:41 +0900
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Hello Richard, I'm a bit worried that with this procedure, the comments/discussions that we have already had on the mailing list may get lost. I'm thinking e.g. about issues http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/77 or http://www.w3.org/International/track/issues/132 Regards, Martin. On 2011/07/23 1:03, Richard Ishida wrote: > Folks, > > I've been wondering how to manage all the HTML5 related issues that have > been raised for consideration over the past week or so, given that > discussion of them will be spread across multiple emails and sets of > minutes - and it finally dawned on me that this is exactly what tracker > is for. > > So I propose to raise a tracker issue for each comment raised so far in > email, under a product called HTML5-prep or Polyglot-prep (spec specific > - if we have comments on other specs, we should create new products.) > That will give us issue numbers to use when referring to a particular > proposed comment, so that tracker will track it for us across emails and > telecons. > > If we decide not to proceed with a comment, we can closed the issue. If > we do, then we can make a clean copy in the existing 'live' HTML5 > product or the Polyglot product, so that it can be tracked as an > official comment. > > Unfortunately, this will mean you getting a bunch of emails as I trawl > through the email comments sent so far. Please bear with us for that. > > For future review work, we should probably just raise a new tracker > issue for each comment, rather than send by email. (Be sure to choose > the *-prep product, however, or the comment will be sent prematurely to > other WG lists). > > Cheers, > RI > >
Received on Monday, 25 July 2011 04:16:07 UTC