- From: Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin <aharon@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:57:24 -0800
- To: "Phillips, Addison" <addison@lab126.com>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net)" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com)" <mjs@apple.com>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTi=g2rjpb393dxh-W=5O1EAZxLBr_7HJoO=yWvMi@mail.gmail.com>
FYI, over the last couple of days, Ian has made progress on 3 (10823, 10828, 11734) out of the 5 bugs that still require action. (It's no my turn on them, but I am having trouble seeing the change he made in the HTML5 spec.) So, I am relieved to say that the door does not seem to be closed yet, and I do think that we should be able to come to an amicable resolution with the editor. Of course, I am still hoping to hear from him re the other two issues (10808 and 11829). Thanks, Aharon On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Phillips, Addison <addison@lab126.com>wrote: > I'm happy to have a phone call: we really need to understand this so we can > work effectively with you. We're generally pleased with the process so far, > but, although you sentences are simple and declarative, I don't feel I know > if we should be escalating issues into Issues or not. > > Is there a convenient time for us to chat? > > Addison > > Addison Phillips > Globalization Architect (Lab126) > Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs) > > Internationalization is not a feature. > It is an architecture. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 8:05 AM > > To: Richard Ishida; Phillips, Addison > > Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); > > Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com); Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org) > > Subject: RE: process question and query about ISSUE-88 > > > > One further thought, if you think a phone call would help to > > explain the HTML WG processes please just let me know. > > > > /paulc > > > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > Tel: <%28425%29%20705-9596>(425) 705-9596 Fax: <%28425%29%20936-7329>(425) > 936-7329 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Cotton > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 9:33 AM > > To: 'Richard Ishida'; Phillips, Addison > > Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); > > Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com); Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org) > > Subject: RE: process question and query about ISSUE-88 > > > > > Aharon didn't really understood what he had to do here, and > > Addison and I weren't able to understand it either. > > > > The HTML WG Chairs sent the following email on Sep 7, 2010 that > > outlined a plan for how the WG was going to get to Last Call: > > > > Timeline to Last Call > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html > > > > > Reminder: - Jan 22, 2010 is the cutoff for escalating bugs for > > pre-LC consideration - all issues in tracker, calls for proposal > > issued by this date. > > >Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will be > > treated as a Last Call comment. > > > > If you review the message above it explains in detail what Sam was > > trying to explain. Basically in your case if you disagreed with > > the disposition of any of your bugs that were filed before Oct 1, > > you had until Jan 22 to request that they be escalated into WG > > Tracker issues. > > > > Please let me know if you understand the situations after reviewing > > the above message and this email. > > > > /paulc > > > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > Tel: <%28425%29%20705-9596>(425) 705-9596 Fax: <%28425%29%20936-7329>(425) > 936-7329 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Richard Ishida [mailto:ishida@w3.org] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:36 AM > > To: Phillips, Addison > > Cc: Paul Cotton; public-i18n-core@w3.org; Sam Ruby > > (rubys@intertwingly.net); Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com); > > Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org) > > Subject: Re: process question and query about ISSUE-88 > > > > I think one specific question was, what does this mean: > > > > "--- Comment #57 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2011-01-17 > > 21:54:41 UTC --- > > Reminder: - Jan 22, 2010 is the cutoff for escalating bugs for pre- > > LC consideration - all issues in tracker, calls for proposal issued > > by this date. > > Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will be > > treated as a Last Call comment. > > " > > > > Aharon didn't really understood what he had to do here, and Addison > > and I weren't able to understand it either. > > > > RI > > > > Richard Ishida > > Internationalization Activity Lead > > W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) > > > > http://www.w3.org/International/ > > http://rishida.net/ > > > > On 10/02/2011 06:11, Phillips, Addison wrote: > > > Hello Paul, > > > > > > Thanks for the response. Our list of re-opened bugs is scattered > > across a couple of teleconferences. We'll pull the list together > > for you. It isn't a long list. > > > > > > I am not sure that our intention was to escalate them to WG > > issues, at least, not in all cases. Our goal was to decide whether > > your WG's or editor's proposed resolution satisfied us. I'm not > > sure that any issues require resolution before LC, assuming that LC > > issues will be dealt with on an equal footing. Nonetheless, I will > > check with the WG membership before committing to any particular > > resolution. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Addison > > > > > > Addison Phillips > > > Globalization Architect (Lab126) > > > Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs) > > > > > > Internationalization is not a feature. > > > It is an architecture. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 8:53 PM > > >> To: Phillips, Addison > > >> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); > > >> Maciej Stachowiak (mjs@apple.com); Michael(tm) Smith > > (mike@w3.org) > > >> Subject: RE: process question and query about ISSUE-88 > > >> > > >>> Recently (a few weeks ago, actually), our WG reopened a few > > bugs > > >> filed before your cutoff date. We would like to know how these > > will > > >> be handled, etc. That is: what is your process for clearing our > > open > > >> bugs? > > >> > > >> Can you help us here by explicitly listing the bugs you re- > > opened? > > >> > > >> Please note that the Jan 22 deadline was for the escalation of > > bugs > > >> into WG issues. See: > > >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > > html/2010Sep/0074.html > > >> > > >>> - Jan 22, 2010 - cutoff for escalating bugs for pre-LC > > >> consideration - all issues in tracker, calls for proposal issued > > by > > >> this date > > >>> Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will > > >> be treated as a Last Call comment. > > >> > > >> Was your intent to convert the re-opened bugs in WG Issues to > > ensure > > >> they were handled before Last Call? > > >> > > >> /paulc > > >> > > >> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > >> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > >> Tel: <%28425%29%20705-9596>(425) 705-9596 Fax: <%28425%29%20936-7329>(425) > 936-7329 > > >> > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Phillips, Addison [mailto:addison@lab126.com] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 11:48 AM > > >> To: Paul Cotton; Sam Ruby (rubys@intertwingly.net); Maciej > > Stachowiak > > >> (mjs@apple.com); Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org) > > >> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org > > >> Subject: process question and query about ISSUE-88 > > >> > > >> Dear HTML5 WG chairs, > > >> > > >> I have been tasked [1][2] by the Internationalization WG with > > >> touching base with you about two topics. > > >> > > >> 1. Recently (a few weeks ago, actually), our WG reopened a few > > bugs > > >> filed before your cutoff date. We would like to know how these > > will > > >> be handled, etc. That is: what is your process for clearing our > > open > > >> bugs? > > >> > > >> 2. We noticed also that ISSUE-88 seems to have gone dormant and > > are > > >> wondering about the status of this issue. There is no recent > > update > > >> on http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html. Is any > > progress > > >> being made there. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Addison > > >> > > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/16 ACTION-16 > > [2] > > >> http://www.w3.org/International/track/actions/19 ACTION-19 > > >> > > >> Addison Phillips > > >> Globalization Architect (Lab126) > > >> Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs) > > >> > > >> Internationalization is not a feature. > > >> It is an architecture. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2011 16:58:18 UTC