- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 17:15:09 +0200
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 02:11:20 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > So I guess the question is, what's the right way forward here? I think the right way forward is to not worry about Unicode Normalization as we previously decided for e.g. Selectors (which made it to PR; I do not get why we have the exact same discussion again for CSS Namespaces, which are not used by most authors). We could maybe encourage validators to say something about it (as Validator.nu already does, I believe), but at this point it is simply too late to change the entire platform around. For better or worse, we are stuck with 16-bit code units. (Sorry for jumping in so late. I was away.) -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 19 June 2011 15:15:58 UTC