- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:46:34 -0700
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>, "public-i18n-bidi@w3.org" <public-i18n-bidi@w3.org>
On 09/24/2010 12:46 PM, Richard Ishida wrote: > Folks, > > I plan to raise comments 6,7, and 8 at > http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0802-html5/ as HTML5 bugs. > > Any comments? Issue #1: Completely agreed. This is very important. Issue #2: Agreed. Issue #3: I propose making this a RFC2119 RECOMMENDation, rather than a non-normative note. Issue #4: If you want rlo on block elements to work, you must also raise an issue against CSS2.1. Currently bidi-override does not affect the contents of child blocks, only child inlines. Issue #5: I recommend the term "document-wide audience language" or, to use an older proposal, "pragma-set audience language" in place of "document-wide default language". This also makes it clear what the purpose of such headers are: they declare the intended audience language, not the content language. Everything else looks fine. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 25 September 2010 01:47:41 UTC