FW: closing IRIEverywhere

FYI...

Addison Phillips
Globalization Architect (Lab126)
Chair (W3C I18N, IETF IRI WGs)

Internationalization is not a feature.
It is an architecture.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-iri-request@w3.org [mailto:public-iri-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Grosso, Paul
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 9:12 AM
To: www-tag@w3.org
Cc: public-iri@w3.org; public-xml-core-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: closing IRIEverywhere

The XML Core WG discussed this issue and has consensus that, 
should the wording currently in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-7.1
ever end up in an RFC, it would be sufficient to allow us
to replace our LEIRI WG Note with a reference to that wording.

paul

Paul Grosso for the XML Core WG

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Larry Masinter [mailto:masinter@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Larry
> Masinter
> Sent: Tuesday, 2010 May 04 0:57
> To: Grosso, Paul; 'Henry S. Thompson'; 'Julian Reschke'
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org; public-iri@w3.org
> Subject: RE: closing IRIEverywhere
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00#section-1.3
> 
> contains a definition in section 1.3 on "LEIRI proessing" which should
> in fact be a definition of LEIRI:
> 
>      LEIRI:  This term was used in
>       various XML specifications to refer to strings that, although
> not
>       valid IRIs, were acceptable input to the processing rules in
>       Section 7.1.
> 
> 
> where Section 7.1 of the same document is intended to contain an
> algorithm that will convert an LEIRI to an IRI.
> 
> 
> If that's adequate for XML Core to change its reference for LEIRI,
> fine, and if you need more, please say so, preferably by opening
> a bug on the IRI spec at
> 
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/iri/trac/report/1
> 
> 
> Larry
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grosso, Paul [mailto:pgrosso@ptc.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 7:14 AM
> To: Henry S. Thompson; Julian Reschke
> Cc: Larry Masinter; www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: RE: closing IRIEverywhere
> 
> The XML Core WG awaits a more definitive response.
> 
> paul
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On
> Behalf
> > Of Henry S. Thompson
> > Sent: Wednesday, 2010 April 21 10:45
> > To: Julian Reschke
> > Cc: Larry Masinter; www-tag@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: closing IRIEverywhere
> >
> > Julian Reschke writes:
> >
> > > On 21.04.2010 17:23, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > >> Hash: SHA1
> > >>
> > >> Larry Masinter writes:
> > >>
> > >>> 1.  Develop a draft of what a replacement to [LEIRI] would look
> > like,
> > >>> given the current content of IRI-BIS. Coordinate with IRI-WG if
> any
> > >>> changes are needed to IRI-BIS, and continue to track IRI-WG.
> > >>
> > >> What specific document should we be looking at?  It is not
> obvious
> > >> - From your message.
> > >> ...
> > >
> > > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-iri-3987bis-00> would be my
> > guess.
> >
> > That was my guess, but that has not changed much if at all from the
> > version LEIRIs was based on, and my understanding was that the
> IRI-WG
> > had moved rather further since then.  If that is the case, there is
> no
> > point starting from an about-to-be-superseded document. . .
>

Received on Thursday, 15 July 2010 16:14:57 UTC