- From: Phillips, Addison <addison@amazon.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:40:34 -0700
- To: "marcosc@opera.com" <marcosc@opera.com>, "ishida@w3.org" <ishida@w3.org>
- CC: "public-Webapps@w3.org" <public-Webapps@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
(personal response) > > Fantastic. Unfortunately, implementer feedback has raised concerns > about ITS and so the WG has put ITS features "at risk" (and marked > as > such in the soon to be released CR spec). We will see what happens > in > CR; hopefully implementers will understand the value of > implementing > it. > I noticed that in the transreq. Obviously the I18N WG is concerned about any such feedback: can webapps please share what the concerns are? I know that many developers consider bidi support "kind of scary"; I hope that the implementation issues are not simply fear driven. Is there some way that the Internationalization community can support implementers? Addison Addison Phillips Globalization Architect -- Lab126 Internationalization is not a feature. It is an architecture.
Received on Friday, 10 July 2009 15:41:33 UTC