- From: Felix Sasaki <felix.sasaki@fh-potsdam.de>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:55:08 +0200
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
- Message-ID: <ba4134970906221455w17da46a5xfc0156600c30a42d@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, looking at http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-skos-primer-20090615/#secnotations I am wondering if SKOS recommends the usage of language tags in an appropriate manner. I am not sure about this passage: [ However, the management of such datatypes can be cumbersome. Further, the previous pattern is not really needed when publishers consider the notations themselves to be simple language-independent labels. In such cases, it is possible to use one SKOS labeling property, for instance skos:prefLabel, in combination with private use language tags (or subtags) as defined by RFC 4646 [RFC4646]. This pattern was first proposed for a list of coded countries [COUNTRYCODES-SKOS] from which the following example is adapted: iso3166:FR skos:prefLabel "France"@en ; skos:prefLabel "FRA"@en-x-notation-threeletter ; skos:prefLabel "250"@x-notation-numerical. ] First, private use language tags are recommended to be used for a "language-independent-label", which seems to be a contradiction in itself. Second, the labels are used for specifying the language of notations as part of e.g. classifications. Notations for classifications are not natural language, but rather closer to identifiers in programming languages, so it seems to me that usage of language tags is not appropriate for this purpose. Any comments? Best, Felix
Received on Monday, 22 June 2009 21:55:53 UTC