- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:00:46 -0400
- To: ishida@w3.org
- CC: www-svg@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
Hi, I18N- ishida@w3.org wrote (on 10/10/08 3:43 PM): > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-SVGMobile12-20080915/ > > Comment 7 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0810-svg-tiny/ > Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: RI > > Location in reviewed document: 10.6.1 > [http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/text.html#TextLayoutIntroduction] > > Comment: "For top-to-bottom text, the block-progression-direction > always points 90 degrees counter-clockwise from the reference > orientation vector because the only available top-to-bottom writing > mode is tb-rl." > > I think this sentence needs to be deleted, since SVG Tiny doesn't > support vertical text. If it is there as a general statement, it > should be made clearer, and corrected to say that tb-rl is not the > only vertical writing mode. I've removed the offending sentence, but be warned that it may return in SVG Full. How would you reword this in light of writing-mode="tb-lr" (for Mongolian, Manchu and Phags-pa script), a value not covered in SVG 1.1 Full? Please let us know if this satisfies your comment, in terms of the SVG 1.2 Tiny spec. Regards- -Doug
Received on Saturday, 11 October 2008 03:01:00 UTC