- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 14:02:50 +0100
- To: <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-smil@w3.org>
-----Original Message----- From: tmichel@w3.org [mailto:tmichel@w3.org] Sent: 23 October 2007 10:08 To: Richard Ishida Cc: www-smil@w3.org Subject: Re: [SMIL3.0] i18n comment 4: default colors (non-i18n) Dear Richard Ishida , The SYMM Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the Synchronized Multimedia Integration Language (SMIL 3.0) published on 13 Jul 2007. Thank you for having taken the time to review the document and to send us comments! The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. Please review it carefully and let us know by email at www-smil@w3.org if you agree with it or not before 02 nov 2007. In case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. Thanks, For the SYMM Working Group, Thierry Michel W3C Staff Contact 1. http://www.w3.org/mid/20070830201249.A40D54F018@homer.w3.org 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/ ===== Your comment on 8. SMIL 3.0 smilText: > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/ > > Comment 4 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0708-smil30/ > Editorial/substantive: S > Owner: AP > > Location in reviewed document: > 8 [http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-SMIL3-20070713/smil-text.html] > > Comment:The default colors for both textColor and textBackgroundColor > is "transparent". Is this intentional? Working Group Resolution: The default for textBackgroundColor was intentionally set to transparent. This follows the defaults defined by XSL 1.1. For textColor, this was an error: for compatibility with CSS2, we have decided to set the initial value to being implementation dependent. ----
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2007 13:00:20 UTC