- From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 11:26:17 +0100
- To: <public-comments-wcag20@w3.org>, <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of ishida@w3.org > Sent: 27 June 2006 19:54 > To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org; public-i18n-core@w3.org > Subject: [WCAG2 TECHS] i18n comment: H62 Ex4 descn > > > Comment from the i18n review of: > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-WCAG20-TECHS-20060427/ > > Comment 21 > At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-wcag2-techniques/ > Editorial/substantive: S > Owner: RI > > Location in reviewed document: > H62, Examples > > Comment: > "rp is used to ensure that pronunciation information shown > through Ruby text is displayed by user agents that do not > support Ruby annotation." > > > This is misleading. The ruby text is always shown - adding rp > doesn't do anything other than make it clearer, for non-ruby > enabled user agents, that the ruby text is ruby text and not a typo. ================================= > From: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com] > Sent: 18 May 2007 00:43 > To: Richard Ishida > Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org > Subject: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Draft of April > 2006 (2 of 2) > Comment 31: > ---------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > ---------------------------- > > We agree with your suggestions. We have clarified the purpose > of the rp element. Thank you. The i18n Core WG is satisfied by this. ============ Richard Ishida Internationalization Lead W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/ http://www.w3.org/International/ http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 10:24:59 UTC