- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 18:45:58 -0600
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20070516004558.GK13419@w3.org>
There's a sorting example in the editor's draft of SPARQL Query
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25#modOrderBy
RDF Term Reason
Unbound results sort earliest.
_:z Blank nodes follow unbound.
_:a There is no relative ordering of blank
nodes.
<http://script.example/Latin> IRIs follow blank nodes.
<http://script.example/Кириллица> The character in the 23rd position,
"К", has a unicode codepoint 0x41A,
which is higher than 0x4C ("L").
<http://script.example/日本語> The character in the 23rd position,
"æ—¥",has a unicode codepoint 0x65E5,
which is higher than 0x41A ("К").
"http://script.example/Latin" Simple literals follow IRIs.
"http://script.example/Latin"^^xsd:string xsd:strings follow simple literals.
which is meant to illustrate codepoint ordering of IRIs. I don't
believe 日本語 identifies a script. Should I use æ¼¢å— (0x6F22) instead?
Is Кириллица correct? Would something from Byzantine Musical
Symbols speak to a wider audience?
--
-eric
office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
mobile: +1.617.599.3509
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 01:28:16 UTC