- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 18:45:58 -0600
- To: public-i18n-core@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20070516004558.GK13419@w3.org>
There's a sorting example in the editor's draft of SPARQL Query http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/rq25#modOrderBy RDF Term Reason Unbound results sort earliest. _:z Blank nodes follow unbound. _:a There is no relative ordering of blank nodes. <http://script.example/Latin> IRIs follow blank nodes. <http://script.example/Кириллица> The character in the 23rd position, "К", has a unicode codepoint 0x41A, which is higher than 0x4C ("L"). <http://script.example/日本語> The character in the 23rd position, "æ—¥",has a unicode codepoint 0x65E5, which is higher than 0x41A ("К"). "http://script.example/Latin" Simple literals follow IRIs. "http://script.example/Latin"^^xsd:string xsd:strings follow simple literals. which is meant to illustrate codepoint ordering of IRIs. I don't believe 日本語 identifies a script. Should I use æ¼¢å— (0x6F22) instead? Is Кириллица correct? Would something from Byzantine Musical Symbols speak to a wider audience? -- -eric office: +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA mobile: +1.617.599.3509 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 01:28:16 UTC