RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: 3066 or its successor

> > R103-20:
> > Resolution: Accepted
> > 
> > - Request to reference: "RFC3066 or its successors"
> > - Discussion on the right reference.
> > - [3] includes a version you suggested. 
> > - If it is fine, please send final acceptance
> > 
> > + E-mail Trail
> > - Original Comment Richard Ishida (2006-03-21)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JanMar/0079.html
> > - VBWG official response to last call issue VBWG (2006-05-26)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006AprJun/0085.html
> > - Comment to VBWG official response Richard Ishida (2006-07-28)
> >   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2006JulSep/0027.html


Instead of:
===============
[BCP47]
    IETF BCP 47, currently represented by Tags for the Identification of
Languages, A. Phillips, M. Davis, Editors. IETF, September 2006. This RFC is
available at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4646.txt.
================

Please point to BCP47 using one of the following URIs
-	ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt
-	http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt

We are still awaiting a response from the IETF editor as to which of these
two is preferred. I would think that if you need to choose before we get a
reply, you should just choose whichever you prefer.

Note that the document pointed to by these URIs is a concatenation of RFC
4646 and RFC 4647.  If talking about a specific RFC, however, be sure to say
'or its successor', since we are expecting a successor to appear in a few
months time.

Cheers,
RI

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
http://www.w3.org/International/
http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-i18n-core-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-i18n-core-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Richard Ishida
> Sent: 28 July 2006 12:40
> To: 'Baggia Paolo'; www-voice@w3.org
> Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
> Subject: RE: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: 3066 or its successor
> 
> 
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> I think we can substantially improve on the reference in SVG 
> Mobile by pointing to BCP 47 directly.  The problem is 
> choosing which of the several direct links is best.
> 
> I have sent a note to the person at the IETF who is 
> shepherding RFC 3066bis, and will let you know his reply.
> 
> Cheers,
> RI 
>  
> 
> 
> ============
> Richard Ishida
> Internationalization Lead
> W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)
> 
> http://www.w3.org/People/Ishida/
> http://www.w3.org/International/
> http://people.w3.org/rishida/blog/
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ishida/
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: Baggia Paolo [mailto:paolo.baggia@loquendo.com] 
> 	Sent: 26 May 2006 15:11
> 	To: www-voice@w3.org
> 	Cc: Baggia Paolo; Richard Ishida
> 	Subject: Re: [PLS1.0] i18n comment: 3066 or its successor
> 	
> 	
> 	 
> 	Issue R103-20
> 	From Richard Ishida (2006-03-21):
> 	
> 	Proposed Classification: Clarification / Typo / Editorial 
> 	
> 	Resolution: Accept
> 	
> 	We accept you request and we'll make the following changes: 
> 	
> 	* In fourth para, Section 4.1 [1] 
> 	We will replace 'RFC 3066 [RFC3066]' with 'IETF Best 
> Current Practice
> 	47
> 	[BCP47]'
> 	* In the references in Section 6.1 [2] 
> 	We will add a normative reference to [BCP47] as in [3]
> 	
> 	Is it an acceptable resolution? 
> 	
> 	Please indicate whether you are satisfied with the 
> VBWG's resolution,
> 	whether you think there has been a misunderstanding, or 
> whether you wish
> 	to register an objection. 
> 	
> 	
> 	[1]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/#S4.1 
> 	[2]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/#S6.1 
> 	[3] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/refs.htm 
> 	
> 	Paolo Baggia, editor PLS spec.
> 	
> 	
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> 	---
> 	From: 
> 	Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:42:19 +0000
> 	To: www-voice@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org 
> 	Message-Id: <20060321174219.691144EFDE@homer.w3.org> 
> 	
> 	
> 	Comment from the i18n review of:
> 	http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-pronunciation-lexicon-20060131/
> 	
> 	Comment 20
> 	At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0603-pls10/
> 	Editorial/substantive: S
> 	Owner: RI
> 	
> 	Location in reviewed document:
> 	4.1, 4th para
> 	
> 	Comment:
> 	s/RFC 3066/RFC 3066 or its successor/
> 	
> 	
> 	(Note that 'its successor' has already been approved by 
> the IETF and is
> 	just pending publication.)
> 	
> 	
> 	Gruppo Telecom Italia - Direzione e coordinamento di 
> Telecom Italia S.p.A.
> 	
> 	================================================
> 	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> 	This message and its attachments are addressed solely 
> to the persons
> 	above and may contain confidential information. If you 
> have received
> 	the message in error, be informed that any use of the 
> content hereof
> 	is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the 
> sender and delete
> 	the message. Should you have any questions, please send 
> an e_mail to
> 	
> <mailto:webmaster@telecomitalia.it>webmaster@telecomitalia.it.
>  Thank you
> 	<http://www.loquendo.com>www.loquendo.com
> 	================================================
> 	
> 
> 	
> 
>

Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 12:40:44 UTC