- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
- Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:38:05 +0900
- To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>, "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
The same is true for http://www.ietf.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt. I suggest we use the one at www.ietf.org. This makes it clear that it is the IETF that has approved the relevant documents as BCP. The file at rfc-editor is more 'original' in the sense that the rfc-editor does a final editing pass (in coordination with the authors) and publishes the documents, and the IETF site mirrors them. But this is only after the IETF (in this case the LTRU WG) creates them and (via the IESG) approves them. Regards, Martin. At 09:15 06/12/13, Felix Sasaki wrote: > >... at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/bcp/bcp47.txt says now: > >"[Note that this file is a concatenation of more than one RFC.]" > >- Felix #-#-# Martin J. Du"rst, Assoc. Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University #-#-# http://www.sw.it.aoyama.ac.jp mailto:duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2006 08:26:33 UTC