- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:51:48 +0900
- To: François Yergeau <francois@yergeau.com>
- Cc: public-i18n-core@w3.org
François Yergeau wrote: > [snip] > > > ACTION: Felix to write a mail about possibility for SVG tiny > specific IRI tests to martin and the i18n core list [recorded in > http://www.w3.org/2006/10/10-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] > Still waiting for reply from Chris. an update on this: I met Chris Lilley at the XSL-FO workshop (workshop report will follow), and we talked about the tests again. For him it is important to upload files with non-ascii characters. I will check with Fumi how to do that (Richard had pinged me a while ago on this too). For us / Martin it is important to have tests in another format than HTML, and Chris sad he is very willing to contribute them. So the plan is: - Chris will send us (i18n core, including Martin) tests or links to test which we can adapt to use non-ascii characters. - we will make the IRI tests, give them back to Chris and use them on our own as well. That is: they will be part of the SVG test suite and of our IRI-spec test suite. [snip] > > LC drafts for review > ==================== > - Content Selection for Device Independence (DISelect) 1.0 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-20061010/ > no i18n specific stuff > > - Delivery Context: XPath Access Functions 1.0 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-xaf-20061010/ > Potentially issues at > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-xaf-20061010/#sec-units > We don't see the issues here, need to ask Felix who is not on the call. The list at http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-cselection-xaf-20061010/#sec-units is closed with respect to the unit types. At the xsl-fo workshop, Jagat / Justsystem / Anntenna House said for XSL-FO they want to have a type "q", which is 0.25 mm. My question is if we should ask the DI group to add this type here. > > - CSS3 Module: Paged Media > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-page-20061010/ > ACTION: RI and FY to review this spec. > > - Semantic Annotations for WSDL > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-sawsdl-20060928/ > no i18n specific stuff > > - Voice Extensible Markup Language (VoiceXML) 2.1 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-voicexml21-20060915/ > ACTION: RI to review this spec. > > - XML Binding Language (XBL) 2.0 > http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xbl-20060907/ > no i18n specific stuff > > ACTION: Felix to update the review radar done. Note that I did not pute VoiceXML 2.1 here, because the official LC period is other. Richard, what is your timeline for doing this? Cheers, Felix
Received on Thursday, 19 October 2006 04:52:02 UTC