- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:43:56 +0900
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <442967CC.4040600@w3.org>
.. at http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html
and below as text.
- Felix
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
i18n core working group
28 Mar 2006
See also: [2]IRC log
[2] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-irc
Attendees
Present
Felix, Francois, Mary, Richard
Regrets
Karunesh, Vijay
Chair
Francois
Scribe
Felix
Contents
* [3]Topics
1. [4]action items
2. [5]WS Addr review
3. [6]XML Schema data types review
4. [7]charmod resid update
5. [8]meeting time scheduling
6. [9]other business?
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
last minutes: [11]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-i18ncore-minutes.html
[11] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-i18ncore-minutes.html
action items
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to obtain a status update from Martin by next
week (DONE) [recorded in
[12]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on
charmod-norm (ONGOING) [recorded in
[13]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu
on ws i18n (ONGOING) [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
Mary: question:
... what else do we need to do ?
... if we think we have two docs: the data stream and the policy
document
... for the ws-i18n draft (about the data stream), do we need test
cases?
Francois: what would these specs say?
Felix: would there be s.t. testable in the ws-i18n draft?
Mary: it would just show the header
... but not specify how you decide from your service / your produces
that this is the content should be
... the other doc (ws policy) would be how you determine the content
Francois: so the data stream seems to be more testable to me
... is it possible to do it in one doc?
Mary: the security policy has the framework
... security policy is separate from the security spec
Francois: sure, I'm just wondering if it needs two documents
... or if we could have one doc with various sections
... would be easier for publication
Mary: we should do that
... well, I need to talk to the policy people
Francois: it may be easier to talk to people with s.t. published or
close to published
Mary: I'll finish the update we did
... turn out everything which refers to features and properties
... and replace it with "s.t." about policy
Francois: what's policy right now? Oasis?
Mary: I don't know. There's ws policy framework
... then the security, which is analogous to what we do
... i.e. it sits under the framework
... I heard that IBM people would try to get chartered as a policy
WG
Francois: so we do the updates, and put at least place holder in the
doc
<scribe> ACTION: felix to go trough LTLI within the next 2 weeks, to
make it ready for first publication (ONGOING) [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
Felix: will present s.t. next meeting
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to go through the xml:lang CDR review issue
and decide whether we should continue discussion (PENDING) [recorded
in [16]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
felix: the CDR WG says they want to have an answer until next week
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to send out the PLS comments (DONE)
[recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
WS Addr review
Mary: I'd like to do it, but until Thursday is not enough time
<scribe> ACTION: Mary to look at WS Addr, Felix to ask WG for an
review extension until next week tuesday [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
XML Schema data types review
Francois: I'll do it at the beginning of this afternoon, and send
mail to our WG
... if there is no objection, we don't need to wait until next
Tuesday
charmod resid update
Francois: we need s.t. like an implementation report
... the usual thing for exiting CR
Felix: a timeline?
Francois: would be good
... if the test suite would be ready in some weeks, it would be good
Felix: the student is finished now, Martin will continue the work
Francois: how about hosting?
... we need a stable host
Richard: w3c site?
Francois: would be ideal
... but we mainly need a stable host
... if Martin can gurantee that, that would be great
Felix: the tests have to be on different OS based servers as well,
maybe easier for Martin to update
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to talk to Martin on IRI tests: what are
requirements for hosting? [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
Felix: tbd tomorrow
Francois: difficult: at w3c site, various OS is difficult, at
Martin's place, stability is a problem
meeting time scheduling
Francois: Richard has changed this week to DST, I will change next
week
... agreement on one hour earlier?
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to make regular call 1 hour earlier (talk to
zakim) [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
other business?
Richard: I'll go to the voice browser WG meeting in Greece
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: Felix to make regular call 1 hour earlier (talk to
zakim) [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: Felix to talk to Martin on IRI tests: what are
requirements for hosting? [recorded in
[22]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: Mary to look at WS Addr, Felix to ask WG for an review
extension until next week tuesday [recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
[PENDING] ACTION: felix to go trough LTLI within the next 2 weeks,
to make it ready for first publication [recorded in
[24]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
[PENDING] ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on
charmod-norm [recorded in
[25]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
[PENDING] ACTION: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu
on ws i18n [recorded in
[26]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
[PENDING] ACTION: Richard to go through the xml:lang CDR review
issue and decide whether we should continue discussion [recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
[DONE] ACTION: Felix to obtain a status update from Martin by next
week [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
[DONE] ACTION: Richard to send out the PLS comments [recorded in
[29]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [30]scribe.perl version 1.127
([31]CVS log)
$Date: 2006/03/28 16:42:00 $
[30] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[31] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2006 16:44:07 UTC