- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 01:43:56 +0900
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <442967CC.4040600@w3.org>
.. at http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html and below as text. - Felix [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ i18n core working group 28 Mar 2006 See also: [2]IRC log [2] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-irc Attendees Present Felix, Francois, Mary, Richard Regrets Karunesh, Vijay Chair Francois Scribe Felix Contents * [3]Topics 1. [4]action items 2. [5]WS Addr review 3. [6]XML Schema data types review 4. [7]charmod resid update 5. [8]meeting time scheduling 6. [9]other business? * [10]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ last minutes: [11]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-i18ncore-minutes.html [11] http://www.w3.org/2006/03/21-i18ncore-minutes.html action items <scribe> ACTION: Felix to obtain a status update from Martin by next week (DONE) [recorded in [12]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] <scribe> ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod-norm (ONGOING) [recorded in [13]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] <scribe> ACTION: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu on ws i18n (ONGOING) [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] Mary: question: ... what else do we need to do ? ... if we think we have two docs: the data stream and the policy document ... for the ws-i18n draft (about the data stream), do we need test cases? Francois: what would these specs say? Felix: would there be s.t. testable in the ws-i18n draft? Mary: it would just show the header ... but not specify how you decide from your service / your produces that this is the content should be ... the other doc (ws policy) would be how you determine the content Francois: so the data stream seems to be more testable to me ... is it possible to do it in one doc? Mary: the security policy has the framework ... security policy is separate from the security spec Francois: sure, I'm just wondering if it needs two documents ... or if we could have one doc with various sections ... would be easier for publication Mary: we should do that ... well, I need to talk to the policy people Francois: it may be easier to talk to people with s.t. published or close to published Mary: I'll finish the update we did ... turn out everything which refers to features and properties ... and replace it with "s.t." about policy Francois: what's policy right now? Oasis? Mary: I don't know. There's ws policy framework ... then the security, which is analogous to what we do ... i.e. it sits under the framework ... I heard that IBM people would try to get chartered as a policy WG Francois: so we do the updates, and put at least place holder in the doc <scribe> ACTION: felix to go trough LTLI within the next 2 weeks, to make it ready for first publication (ONGOING) [recorded in [15]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] Felix: will present s.t. next meeting <scribe> ACTION: Richard to go through the xml:lang CDR review issue and decide whether we should continue discussion (PENDING) [recorded in [16]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] felix: the CDR WG says they want to have an answer until next week <scribe> ACTION: Richard to send out the PLS comments (DONE) [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] WS Addr review Mary: I'd like to do it, but until Thursday is not enough time <scribe> ACTION: Mary to look at WS Addr, Felix to ask WG for an review extension until next week tuesday [recorded in [18]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07] XML Schema data types review Francois: I'll do it at the beginning of this afternoon, and send mail to our WG ... if there is no objection, we don't need to wait until next Tuesday charmod resid update Francois: we need s.t. like an implementation report ... the usual thing for exiting CR Felix: a timeline? Francois: would be good ... if the test suite would be ready in some weeks, it would be good Felix: the student is finished now, Martin will continue the work Francois: how about hosting? ... we need a stable host Richard: w3c site? Francois: would be ideal ... but we mainly need a stable host ... if Martin can gurantee that, that would be great Felix: the tests have to be on different OS based servers as well, maybe easier for Martin to update <scribe> ACTION: Felix to talk to Martin on IRI tests: what are requirements for hosting? [recorded in [19]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08] Felix: tbd tomorrow Francois: difficult: at w3c site, various OS is difficult, at Martin's place, stability is a problem meeting time scheduling Francois: Richard has changed this week to DST, I will change next week ... agreement on one hour earlier? <scribe> ACTION: Felix to make regular call 1 hour earlier (talk to zakim) [recorded in [20]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09] other business? Richard: I'll go to the voice browser WG meeting in Greece Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: Felix to make regular call 1 hour earlier (talk to zakim) [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09] [NEW] ACTION: Felix to talk to Martin on IRI tests: what are requirements for hosting? [recorded in [22]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08] [NEW] ACTION: Mary to look at WS Addr, Felix to ask WG for an review extension until next week tuesday [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07] [PENDING] ACTION: felix to go trough LTLI within the next 2 weeks, to make it ready for first publication [recorded in [24]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] [PENDING] ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod-norm [recorded in [25]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] [PENDING] ACTION: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu on ws i18n [recorded in [26]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] [PENDING] ACTION: Richard to go through the xml:lang CDR review issue and decide whether we should continue discussion [recorded in [27]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] [DONE] ACTION: Felix to obtain a status update from Martin by next week [recorded in [28]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] [DONE] ACTION: Richard to send out the PLS comments [recorded in [29]http://www.w3.org/2006/03/28-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [30]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([31]CVS log) $Date: 2006/03/28 16:42:00 $ [30] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [31] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Tuesday, 28 March 2006 16:44:07 UTC