- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:25:49 +0900
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <43FBF5DD.70805@w3.org>
Hi,
The minutes of yesterday's call are at
http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html
and below as text.
- Felix
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
i18n core working group
21 Feb 2006
[2]Agenda
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Feb/0028.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-irc
Attendees
Present
Felix, Francois, Karunesh, Mary, Richard, Vijay
Regrets
Chair
Francois
Scribe
Felix
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]action items
2. [6]css selector reviews / cdf
3. [7]MWBP 1.0 update (from Richard)
4. [8]http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2006/i18ncore-f2f-
20060302-agenda.html
* [9]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
action items
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to Ask HP AC rep about HP participation in
tech plenary (DONE) but I guess too late for tech plenary, maybe we
find some body in general [recorded in
[10]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to schedule a meeting with WS folks on
Thursday and Friday (DONE) but not successfuly the meeting will be
on Monday / Tuesday, within the WSDL group [recorded in
[11]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to review the PLS spec (ONGOING) [recorded
in [12]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: all except Mary to read ws-i18n before the tech
plenary (ONGOING) [recorded in
[13]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to ask Addison and Mark about language tags
in CSS (ONGOING) hope to be able to talk to them at the Unicode
conference [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
<scribe> ACTION: francois / all to go through charmod norm comments
(ONGOING) [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
francois: that will mostly happen during the tech plenary
<scribe> ACTION: [16]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews
[recorded in
[17]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
[16] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews
felix: 3 new documents:
... xml schema data types
... wsdl addr 1.0
... p3p 1.1
... [18]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-2-20060217/
[18] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-2-20060217/
francois: real issues with xml schema data types
... with time and date stuff
felix: they have taken some stuff from xquery
francois: they have data types in different name spaces
felix: that might be solved soon
on p3p 1.1:
[19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/
0197.html
[19]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/0197.html
richard: could we get martin to review that?
<scribe> ACTION: felix to ping martin to review p3p 1.1 [recorded in
[20]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
<scribe> ACTION: felix to ask mark davis to participate in the
review of xml schema data types [recorded in
[21]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
<scribe> ACTION: mary to review wsdl addr 1.0
[22]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl
[recorded in
[23]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action10]
[22] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl
francois: we should set mary as the main reviewer
felix: will do
<r12a> [24]http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-lang/
[24] http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-lang/
<r12a> [25]http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/02/content_negotiation.html
[25] http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/02/content_negotiation.html
richard: wrote comments on this
... I will ask them to get i18n review stuff by i18n geo or core
people
felix: do you want us to go through your comments and send them as
core comments?
richard: no, don't need to make this formal at this stage. I'll just
copy to the list
felix: what issues did you have with the article?
richard: they miss a bunch of stuff about why one should use
language negation
... and a lot of other stuff.
css selector reviews / cdf
felix: no update
francois: we will meet them at the tech plenary
... what is open for CDF?
felix: IRI stuff
... and spelling errors, we don't have to follow these
MWBP 1.0 update (from Richard)
<r12a> [26]http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/
[26] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/
richard: comment 7:
felix: will it be o.k. to give them the comments later?
richard: the deadline was last week
felix: I will make the changes tomorrow
richard: in Unicode you need more bytes for indic scripts
... it is a true statement, why include it here?
francois: one point that is worth making:
... if you have fields with fixed length
... they might not be big enough
... if they are created for latin languages
richard: what do you propose?
felix: to say "take lenght issues for forms into account"
francois: people try to take band width into account
... so they have to be careful of script related issues
richard: so to say "you may want to consider special compression
forms of Unicode"
francois: an additional point: if you want to translate to a
different encoding, a different bandwith might be necessary
<scribe> ACTION: richard to try a formulation for comment 9
[recorded in
[27]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action11]
felix: I'll try s.t. before as well
comment 10
richard: what is the issue?
francois: in a mobile, you might not have the option to get
translations
richard: e.g. the pull down menues
francois: yes. it is not technically impossible, but I don't know if
it exists
felix: example of a lexicon which can only be accessed from a
non-mobile HP
... and as the comment: make this obvious in the comment
richard: have a wording on it tomorrow?
<scribe> ACTION: felix and richard to finish up mwbp comments
tomorrow (richard's time) [recorded in
[28]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action12]
comment 16
richard: we say "has to be made"
... how about "would be"?
felix: o.k.
richard: comment 24
felix: I'll go trough it tomorrow
comment 28
francois: to encourage them to use standard mechanisms for lang
decl?
richard: they should point to the standard mechanisms
francois: good thing
... I would add:
... there may be a mobile specific mean
... use the standards for language, if there is s.t. else (mobile
specific), go ahead
richard: o.k., I'll change that
francois: use the standards as far as possible, then go behind it
richard: last comment:
... encourage Unicode
all agree on that
[29]http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2006/i18ncore-f2f-20060302-ag
enda.html
[29]
http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2006/i18ncore-f2f-20060302-agenda.html
francois: filled everthing, except for the last slot
... the slot for ws will be empty
felix: how about using more time for charmod (norm)?
francois: some items can be short, e.g. ltli
... fine everybody?
... 90 minutes o.k. for ws i18n?
richard: tech plenary is very useful
... to talk to other groups
... the 4 days as i18n core
<scribe> ACTION: felix to set up a meeting with xml core / xml
schema people about charmod norm [recorded in
[30]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action13]
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: felix and richard to finish up mwbp comments tomorrow
(richard's time) [recorded in
[31]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action12]
[NEW] ACTION: Felix to ask Addison and Mark about language tags in
CSS (ONGOING) hope to be able to talk to them at the Unicode
conference [recorded in
[32]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
[NEW] ACTION: Felix to Ask HP AC rep about HP participation in tech
plenary (DONE) but I guess too late for tech plenary, maybe we find
some body in general [recorded in
[33]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: felix to ask mark davis to participate in the review
of xml schema data types [recorded in
[34]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
[NEW] ACTION: felix to ping martin to review p3p 1.1 [recorded in
[35]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
[NEW] ACTION: Felix to schedule a meeting with WS folks on Thursday
and Friday (DONE) but not successfuly the meeting will be on Monday
/ Tuesday, within the WSDL group [recorded in
[36]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: felix to set up a meeting with xml core / xml schema
people about charmod norm [recorded in
[37]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action13]
[NEW] ACTION: [38]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews
[recorded in
[39]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
[NEW] ACTION: mary to review wsdl addr 1.0
[40]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl
[recorded in
[41]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action10]
[NEW] ACTION: richard to try a formulation for comment 9 [recorded
in [42]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action11]
[38] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews
[40] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl
[PENDING] ACTION: all except Mary to read ws-i18n before the tech
plenary [recorded in
[43]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
[PENDING] ACTION: francois / all to go through charmod norm comments
[recorded in
[44]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
[PENDING] ACTION: Francois to review the PLS spec [recorded in
[45]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
[End of minutes]
_________________________________________________________
Minutes formatted by David Booth's [46]scribe.perl version 1.127
([47]CVS log)
$Date: 2006/02/22 04:40:41 $
[46] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm
[47] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:25:59 UTC