- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:25:49 +0900
- To: "public-i18n-core@w3.org" <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <43FBF5DD.70805@w3.org>
Hi, The minutes of yesterday's call are at http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html and below as text. - Felix [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ i18n core working group 21 Feb 2006 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Feb/0028.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-irc Attendees Present Felix, Francois, Karunesh, Mary, Richard, Vijay Regrets Chair Francois Scribe Felix Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]action items 2. [6]css selector reviews / cdf 3. [7]MWBP 1.0 update (from Richard) 4. [8]http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2006/i18ncore-f2f- 20060302-agenda.html * [9]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ action items <scribe> ACTION: Felix to Ask HP AC rep about HP participation in tech plenary (DONE) but I guess too late for tech plenary, maybe we find some body in general [recorded in [10]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] <scribe> ACTION: Felix to schedule a meeting with WS folks on Thursday and Friday (DONE) but not successfuly the meeting will be on Monday / Tuesday, within the WSDL group [recorded in [11]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] <scribe> ACTION: Francois to review the PLS spec (ONGOING) [recorded in [12]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] <scribe> ACTION: all except Mary to read ws-i18n before the tech plenary (ONGOING) [recorded in [13]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] <scribe> ACTION: Felix to ask Addison and Mark about language tags in CSS (ONGOING) hope to be able to talk to them at the Unicode conference [recorded in [14]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] <scribe> ACTION: francois / all to go through charmod norm comments (ONGOING) [recorded in [15]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] francois: that will mostly happen during the tech plenary <scribe> ACTION: [16]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews [recorded in [17]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07] [16] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews felix: 3 new documents: ... xml schema data types ... wsdl addr 1.0 ... p3p 1.1 ... [18]http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-2-20060217/ [18] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xmlschema11-2-20060217/ francois: real issues with xml schema data types ... with time and date stuff felix: they have taken some stuff from xquery francois: they have data types in different name spaces felix: that might be solved soon on p3p 1.1: [19]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/ 0197.html [19] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JanMar/0197.html richard: could we get martin to review that? <scribe> ACTION: felix to ping martin to review p3p 1.1 [recorded in [20]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08] <scribe> ACTION: felix to ask mark davis to participate in the review of xml schema data types [recorded in [21]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09] <scribe> ACTION: mary to review wsdl addr 1.0 [22]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl [recorded in [23]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action10] [22] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl francois: we should set mary as the main reviewer felix: will do <r12a> [24]http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-lang/ [24] http://www.w3.org/International/tutorials/tutorial-lang/ <r12a> [25]http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/02/content_negotiation.html [25] http://www.w3.org/QA/2006/02/content_negotiation.html richard: wrote comments on this ... I will ask them to get i18n review stuff by i18n geo or core people felix: do you want us to go through your comments and send them as core comments? richard: no, don't need to make this formal at this stage. I'll just copy to the list felix: what issues did you have with the article? richard: they miss a bunch of stuff about why one should use language negation ... and a lot of other stuff. css selector reviews / cdf felix: no update francois: we will meet them at the tech plenary ... what is open for CDF? felix: IRI stuff ... and spelling errors, we don't have to follow these MWBP 1.0 update (from Richard) <r12a> [26]http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/ [26] http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0602-mwbp10/ richard: comment 7: felix: will it be o.k. to give them the comments later? richard: the deadline was last week felix: I will make the changes tomorrow richard: in Unicode you need more bytes for indic scripts ... it is a true statement, why include it here? francois: one point that is worth making: ... if you have fields with fixed length ... they might not be big enough ... if they are created for latin languages richard: what do you propose? felix: to say "take lenght issues for forms into account" francois: people try to take band width into account ... so they have to be careful of script related issues richard: so to say "you may want to consider special compression forms of Unicode" francois: an additional point: if you want to translate to a different encoding, a different bandwith might be necessary <scribe> ACTION: richard to try a formulation for comment 9 [recorded in [27]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action11] felix: I'll try s.t. before as well comment 10 richard: what is the issue? francois: in a mobile, you might not have the option to get translations richard: e.g. the pull down menues francois: yes. it is not technically impossible, but I don't know if it exists felix: example of a lexicon which can only be accessed from a non-mobile HP ... and as the comment: make this obvious in the comment richard: have a wording on it tomorrow? <scribe> ACTION: felix and richard to finish up mwbp comments tomorrow (richard's time) [recorded in [28]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action12] comment 16 richard: we say "has to be made" ... how about "would be"? felix: o.k. richard: comment 24 felix: I'll go trough it tomorrow comment 28 francois: to encourage them to use standard mechanisms for lang decl? richard: they should point to the standard mechanisms francois: good thing ... I would add: ... there may be a mobile specific mean ... use the standards for language, if there is s.t. else (mobile specific), go ahead richard: o.k., I'll change that francois: use the standards as far as possible, then go behind it richard: last comment: ... encourage Unicode all agree on that [29]http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2006/i18ncore-f2f-20060302-ag enda.html [29] http://www.w3.org/International/Group/2006/i18ncore-f2f-20060302-agenda.html francois: filled everthing, except for the last slot ... the slot for ws will be empty felix: how about using more time for charmod (norm)? francois: some items can be short, e.g. ltli ... fine everybody? ... 90 minutes o.k. for ws i18n? richard: tech plenary is very useful ... to talk to other groups ... the 4 days as i18n core <scribe> ACTION: felix to set up a meeting with xml core / xml schema people about charmod norm [recorded in [30]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action13] Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: felix and richard to finish up mwbp comments tomorrow (richard's time) [recorded in [31]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action12] [NEW] ACTION: Felix to ask Addison and Mark about language tags in CSS (ONGOING) hope to be able to talk to them at the Unicode conference [recorded in [32]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05] [NEW] ACTION: Felix to Ask HP AC rep about HP participation in tech plenary (DONE) but I guess too late for tech plenary, maybe we find some body in general [recorded in [33]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01] [NEW] ACTION: felix to ask mark davis to participate in the review of xml schema data types [recorded in [34]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09] [NEW] ACTION: felix to ping martin to review p3p 1.1 [recorded in [35]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08] [NEW] ACTION: Felix to schedule a meeting with WS folks on Thursday and Friday (DONE) but not successfuly the meeting will be on Monday / Tuesday, within the WSDL group [recorded in [36]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02] [NEW] ACTION: felix to set up a meeting with xml core / xml schema people about charmod norm [recorded in [37]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action13] [NEW] ACTION: [38]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews [recorded in [39]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07] [NEW] ACTION: mary to review wsdl addr 1.0 [40]http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl [recorded in [41]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action10] [NEW] ACTION: richard to try a formulation for comment 9 [recorded in [42]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action11] [38] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews [40] http://www.w3.org/International/core/reviews#ws-addr-wsdl [PENDING] ACTION: all except Mary to read ws-i18n before the tech plenary [recorded in [43]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04] [PENDING] ACTION: francois / all to go through charmod norm comments [recorded in [44]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06] [PENDING] ACTION: Francois to review the PLS spec [recorded in [45]http://www.w3.org/2006/02/21-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [46]scribe.perl version 1.127 ([47]CVS log) $Date: 2006/02/22 04:40:41 $ [46] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [47] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 05:25:59 UTC