- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 13:20:42 +0900
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, ishida@w3.org
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:34:26 +0900, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 ishida@w3.org wrote: >> >> Comment: You use the name "period" for the character U+002E, which is >> the Unicode 1.0 name for "full stop". You might change the naming or >> make the reference to the Unicode version for this naming explicit. > > This is an official comment on behalf of the CSS working group. > > I've made this change: > > -<p>Working with HTML, authors may use the period (U+002E, > -<code>.</code>) notation as an alternative to the <code>~=</code> > +<p>Working with HTML, authors may use the "full stop" notation > +(U+002E, <code>.</code>) as an alternative to the <code>~=</code> > notation when representing the <code>class</code> attribute. Thus, for > HTML, <code>div.value</code> and <code>div[class~=value]</code> have > the same meaning. The attribute value must immediately follow the > -"period" (<code>.</code>).</p> > +"full stop" (<code>.</code>).</p> > > Please let us know if this does not satisfy your request. > The i18n core working group is satisfied with your resolution. Thank you. Regards, Felix.
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 04:20:56 UTC